Laser lipo and lipocavitation are both non-surgical fat reduction procedures that use different methods to break down and remove fat cells. However, there are a number of reasons why lipocavitation is generally considered to be the better option.
Here are some of the key differences between laser lipo and lipocavitation:
Method: Laser lipo uses laser energy to heat and melt fat cells, which are then removed through small incisions. Lipocavitation uses ultrasound waves to create bubbles inside fat cells, which then rupture and release the fat into the bloodstream.
Pain: Laser lipo is a more invasive procedure and can be more painful than lipocavitation. Lipocavitation is typically a painless procedure.
Downtime: Laser lipo requires 1-2 weeks of downtime for recovery. Lipocavitation typically requires no downtime.
Results: Laser lipo can provide more immediate results than lipocavitation. However, the results of lipocavitation are typically more permanent.
Cost: Laser lipo is more expensive than lipocavitation.
Side effects: Laser lipo can have a number of side effects, including bruising, swelling, pain, and infection. Lipocavitation typically has few side effects.
Overall, lipocavitation is a better option for most people who are looking for a non-surgical fat reduction procedure. It is less invasive, less painful, has less downtime, and is less expensive than laser lipo. Additionally, the results of lipocavitation are typically more permanent.
Here are some additional benefits of lipocavitation:
- It is a non-invasive procedure, so there is no risk of infection or scarring.
- It can be used to target specific areas of fat, such as the abdomen, thighs, and buttocks.
- It is relatively painless and has few side effects.
- The results are typically permanent, as the broken-down fat cells are eliminated from the body.
Recommended At Home Body Sculpting Device:
